Welcome to the Gulf Shores Pier Fishing Forum.
Results 1 to 6 of 6
Like Tree6Likes
  • 2 Post By Haywire
  • 3 Post By Pier#r
  • 1 Post By CarlF

Thread: Another reason not to eat 'trophy' fish...

  1. #1
    We are there! Let's go fishing!!
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Born, bred and someday dead in Midtown Mobile, AL
    Posts
    10,166
    Thanks
    7,916
    Thanked 13,512 Times in 3,994 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Another reason not to eat 'trophy' fish...

    World record striped bass had elevated mercury levels: Should fishermen be concerned?

    World record striped bass had elevated mercury levels: Should fishermen be concerned? (Joe's Outdoor Office) | AL.com

    The average mercury concentration among three samples of muscle tissue was 1.02 ± 0.12 micrograms of mercury per gram of wet tissue, or parts per million (ppm). This concentration is 3.4 times higher than the 0.3 ppm threshold set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that triggers consumption advisories. The Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH) advises that fish having concentrations between 0.48 and 0.97 ppm should be consumed at a frequency limited to one meal per month. Fish having mercury higher than 0.97 ppm are in the "no consumption" category.
    One thing that Brooke, Hughes and Guarisco do agree on is this. Don't eat really large fish. Catch and release the big ones and eat the smaller ones. "Guarisco went on to say, "Don't be afraid to eat fish caught in Alabama waters. Eat the smaller fish or small portions of the larger ones.
    Last edited by Pier#r; 01-09-2014 at 04:56 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Orange Beach, AL
    Posts
    5,110
    Thanks
    4,556
    Thanked 12,070 Times in 1,928 Posts
    Where would you draw the line between "big" and "small" kings? Not that I have to worry about catching really big kings, although accidents have been known to happen.
    FinChaser and Pier#r like this.

  3. #3
    usa
    usa is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    938
    Thanks
    480
    Thanked 371 Times in 147 Posts
    I would say anywhere that there is room for you magic marker .

  4. #4
    We are there! Let's go fishing!!
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Born, bred and someday dead in Midtown Mobile, AL
    Posts
    10,166
    Thanks
    7,916
    Thanked 13,512 Times in 3,994 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by Haywire View Post
    Where would you draw the line between "big" and "small" kings? Not that I have to worry about catching really big kings, although accidents have been known to happen.
    Nothing new really:
    As far as the MR limits and ADEM advisories are concerned the 'magic' numbers would be:
    24" FL = minimum size you can keep (about 4#)
    24"-33" FL = no advisory on consumption (33" = about 10#)
    33"-39" FL = limited consumption (39" = about 17#)
    over 39" FL is not advised to consume.

    So "small kings" 4-10# should be safe to eat.
    "Medium kings" 10-17# should be OK to eat occasionally
    "Large Kings" over 17# are not advisable to eat.

    My conclusion is there are a LOT of sharks out there with mercury poisoning... lol
    Last edited by Pier#r; 01-09-2014 at 10:20 PM.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Pier#r For This Useful Post:


  6. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Mobile, AL
    Posts
    3,635
    Thanks
    321
    Thanked 1,633 Times in 827 Posts
    Barely keepers are the best eating size anyway...
    kingkiller7255 likes this.
    Carl

    Life is too short to drink bad beer.

    Disclaimer: This post and/or report is not a substantiation of or reflection on the true accuracy of the present stock assessment methods. It is only an anecdotal report on or comment concerning local observations. Your results may vary.

  7. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    gulf shores
    Posts
    1,104
    Thanks
    348
    Thanked 433 Times in 134 Posts
    My conclusion is there are a LOT of sharks out there with mercury poisoning... lol[/QUOTE]


    i think your conclusion is correct!! lol
    get the gaff!!!

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •