-
01-09-2014, 04:48 PM #1
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- Born, bred and someday dead in Midtown Mobile, AL
- Posts
- 10,166
- Thanks
- 7,916
- Thanked 13,512 Times in 3,994 Posts
- Blog Entries
- 6
Another reason not to eat 'trophy' fish...
World record striped bass had elevated mercury levels: Should fishermen be concerned?
World record striped bass had elevated mercury levels: Should fishermen be concerned? (Joe's Outdoor Office) | AL.com
The average mercury concentration among three samples of muscle tissue was 1.02 ± 0.12 micrograms of mercury per gram of wet tissue, or parts per million (ppm). This concentration is 3.4 times higher than the 0.3 ppm threshold set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that triggers consumption advisories. The Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH) advises that fish having concentrations between 0.48 and 0.97 ppm should be consumed at a frequency limited to one meal per month. Fish having mercury higher than 0.97 ppm are in the "no consumption" category.One thing that Brooke, Hughes and Guarisco do agree on is this. Don't eat really large fish. Catch and release the big ones and eat the smaller ones. "Guarisco went on to say, "Don't be afraid to eat fish caught in Alabama waters. Eat the smaller fish or small portions of the larger ones.Last edited by Pier#r; 01-09-2014 at 04:56 PM.
-
01-09-2014, 07:12 PM #2
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Location
- Orange Beach, AL
- Posts
- 5,110
- Thanks
- 4,556
- Thanked 12,070 Times in 1,928 Posts
Where would you draw the line between "big" and "small" kings? Not that I have to worry about catching really big kings, although accidents have been known to happen.
-
01-09-2014, 07:47 PM #3
I would say anywhere that there is room for you magic marker .
-
01-09-2014, 10:17 PM #4
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- Born, bred and someday dead in Midtown Mobile, AL
- Posts
- 10,166
- Thanks
- 7,916
- Thanked 13,512 Times in 3,994 Posts
- Blog Entries
- 6
Nothing new really:
As far as the MR limits and ADEM advisories are concerned the 'magic' numbers would be:
24" FL = minimum size you can keep (about 4#)
24"-33" FL = no advisory on consumption (33" = about 10#)
33"-39" FL = limited consumption (39" = about 17#)
over 39" FL is not advised to consume.
So "small kings" 4-10# should be safe to eat.
"Medium kings" 10-17# should be OK to eat occasionally
"Large Kings" over 17# are not advisable to eat.
My conclusion is there are a LOT of sharks out there with mercury poisoning... lolLast edited by Pier#r; 01-09-2014 at 10:20 PM.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Pier#r For This Useful Post:
-
01-10-2014, 09:36 AM #5
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- Mobile, AL
- Posts
- 3,635
- Thanks
- 321
- Thanked 1,633 Times in 827 Posts
Barely keepers are the best eating size anyway...
Carl
Life is too short to drink bad beer.
Disclaimer: This post and/or report is not a substantiation of or reflection on the true accuracy of the present stock assessment methods. It is only an anecdotal report on or comment concerning local observations. Your results may vary.
-
01-10-2014, 09:52 AM #6
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Location
- gulf shores
- Posts
- 1,104
- Thanks
- 348
- Thanked 433 Times in 134 Posts
My conclusion is there are a LOT of sharks out there with mercury poisoning... lol[/QUOTE]
i think your conclusion is correct!! lolget the gaff!!!
Well, after several hours making phone calls, I was able to track down a certain manufacturer’s service center in California. Thankfully, they agreed to send out my needed parts. These were left over...
You would think I would know this!